ATTR vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

ATTR vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 26.05% return.

ATTR

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 26.05%
• 6M: 25.23%
• 1Y: 51.69%
• 3Y*: 31.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATTR vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	3.80%	0.53%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	26.05%	3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ATTR and CLSE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

ATTR vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATTR vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATTR	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.11	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.67	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	10.71	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	38.98	—

Drawdowns

ATTR vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum CLSE drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATTR	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-16.45%	+14.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.85%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.00%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-3.57%	+3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATTR	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14%	13.63%	-10.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.14%	13.91%	-10.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.14%	13.91%	-10.77%

ATTR vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATTR vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATTR and CLSE in my portfolio?

ATTR and CLSE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ATTR or CLSE?

On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATTR or CLSE?

ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATTR or CLSE?

CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.

What is the main difference between ATTR and CLSE?

They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.52% for CLSE.