QAI vs. DFND
QAI (NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QAI is a Long-Short fund tracking the NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
QAI vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QAI
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 13.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
DFND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QAI vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 7.94% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 8.68% | -3.32% | 6.17% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and DFND is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QAI and DFND has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QAI vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QAI | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QAI vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility
QAI vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.73% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.70% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | — | — |
QAI vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.39% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and DFND have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QAI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QAI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
QAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.
QAI is categorized as Long-Short, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. QAI tracks NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 1.50% for DFND.
Find the right allocation for QAI and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer