QAI vs. CLSE
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE).
QAI and CLSE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QAI is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. CLSE is an actively managed fund by Convergence Investment Partners. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.
Performance
QAI vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QAI vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.82% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -5.93% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 2.96% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -3.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 2.96% return.
QAI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
CLSE
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 31.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QAI vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
CLSE
QAI vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAI | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 2.19 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.84 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 4.14 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 19.56 | -10.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAI | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.19 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.25 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and CLSE is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QAI vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than CLSE's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.48% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QAI vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum CLSE drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and CLSE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -16.45% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -7.88% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -2.53% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -3.73% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.67% | -0.50% |
Volatility
QAI vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 2.83%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 5.68% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 10.35% | -5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 14.47% | -6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 13.85% | -7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 13.85% | -7.73% |