ATTR vs. HFSP
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for HFSP.
Performance
ATTR vs. HFSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly higher than HFSP's -13.00% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HFSP
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -13.42%
- YTD
- -13.00%
- 1Y
- -26.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $612.67K | $317.88K | $171.71K | |
| $263.78 | $441.47 | $507.97 |
ATTR vs. HFSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.79% | 0.53% |
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | -13.00% | -9.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and HFSP is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. HFSP — Risk / Return Rank
ATTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HFSP
ATTR vs. HFSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATTR | HFSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.75 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. HFSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum HFSP drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and HFSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | HFSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -37.30% | +35.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -37.30% | +37.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -18.61% | +18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.31% | — |
Volatility
ATTR vs. HFSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | HFSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 17.81% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 24.00% | -20.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 24.00% | -20.70% |
ATTR vs. HFSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSP's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. HFSP - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATTR nor HFSP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and HFSP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.
ATTR and HFSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Arin and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.25% for HFSP.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and HFSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer