ATTR vs. LSEQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and LSEQ (Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for LSEQ.

Performance

ATTR vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than LSEQ's 23.37% return.

ATTR

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 4.05%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

LSEQ

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 12.72%
• YTD: 23.37%
• 1Y: 25.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	$612.67K	$317.88K	$171.71K
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	$52.86K	$48.61K	$59.18K

ATTR vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	4.79%	0.53%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	23.37%	-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ATTR and LSEQ is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

ATTR vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LSEQ

LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATTR vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATTR	LSEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.12	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.27	—

Drawdowns

ATTR vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum LSEQ drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and LSEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATTR	LSEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-8.35%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.53%	+5.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-3.23%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATTR	LSEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	17.01%	-13.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	14.90%	-11.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	14.90%	-11.60%

ATTR vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATTR vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.

Position	TTM	2025
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	1.78%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATTR and LSEQ in my portfolio?

ATTR and LSEQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ATTR or LSEQ?

On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATTR or LSEQ?

ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATTR or LSEQ?

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.

What is the main difference between ATTR and LSEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Arin and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.70% for LSEQ.