PZLV vs. ABEQ
PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ABEQ.
Performance
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZLV
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABEQ
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 9.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 12.17% |
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | -1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZLV and ABEQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZLV vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank
PZLV
ABEQ
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZLV | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.63 | 0.57 | +6.06 |
Drawdowns
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum ABEQ drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and ABEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZLV | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -27.82% | +25.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.94% | +6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -4.08% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZLV | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 8.92% | +5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 10.82% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 13.84% | +0.36% |
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZLV vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison
PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.20% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZLV and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PZLV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PZLV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.
ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.85% for ABEQ.
Find the right allocation for PZLV and ABEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer