PZLV vs. AVLV
PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
PZLV vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZLV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 16.50%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 1Y
- 33.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZLV vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 15.76% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZLV and AVLV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZLV vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
PZLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVLV
PZLV vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZLV | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZLV vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum AVLV drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZLV | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -19.50% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.38% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -3.87% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
PZLV vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZLV | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 12.50% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 17.26% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 17.26% | -3.25% |
PZLV vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZLV vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% |
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZLV and AVLV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PZLV.
AVLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.15% for AVLV.
Find the right allocation for PZLV and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer