PZLV vs. VLUE
PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and VLUE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PZLV is actively managed, while VLUE is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
PZLV vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZLV
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VLUE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 15.14%
- YTD
- 47.08%
- 6M
- 50.18%
- 1Y
- 89.43%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 16.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.20%
PZLV vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 12.17% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 38.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZLV and VLUE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZLV vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
PZLV
VLUE
PZLV vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZLV | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.63 | 0.76 | +5.88 |
Drawdowns
PZLV vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZLV | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -39.47% | +37.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.70% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -6.01% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
PZLV vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZLV | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 17.34% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 17.79% | -3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 19.82% | -5.62% |
PZLV vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZLV vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.42% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZLV and VLUE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PZLV.
VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.15% for VLUE.
Find the right allocation for PZLV and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer