PZLV vs. SMRI
PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and SMRI (Bushido Capital US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for SMRI.
Performance
PZLV vs. SMRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZLV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMRI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZLV vs. SMRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 12.30% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 14.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZLV and SMRI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZLV vs. SMRI — Risk / Return Rank
PZLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMRI
PZLV vs. SMRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZLV | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZLV vs. SMRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum SMRI drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and SMRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZLV | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -18.45% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -6.08% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -2.74% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
PZLV vs. SMRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZLV | SMRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 15.26% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 15.94% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 15.94% | -1.84% |
PZLV vs. SMRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRI's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZLV vs. SMRI - Dividend Comparison
PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.32% | 0.98% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZLV and SMRI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PZLV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PZLV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.
SMRI has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.71% for SMRI.
Find the right allocation for PZLV and SMRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer