PZIV vs. EFAS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PZIV (Pzena International Value ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PZIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Pzena, while EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. PZIV is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PZIV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

PZIV vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena International Value ETF (PZIV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PZIV

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 5.13%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 7.15%
• 6M: 14.33%
• YTD: 21.51%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: 26.08%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	$906.61K	$548.31K	$417.70K
PZIV Pzena International Value ETF	$104.00K	$153.27K	$204.77K

PZIV vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PZIV Pzena International Value ETF	17.82%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PZIV and EFAS is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

PZIV vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PZIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 93
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PZIV vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena International Value ETF (PZIV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PZIV	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.51	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.71	—

Drawdowns

PZIV vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZIV drawdown since its inception was -3.74%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIV and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZIV	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-44.38%	+40.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-6.98%	+6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PZIV	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	10.96%	+3.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	15.52%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.82%	18.23%	-3.41%

PZIV vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZIV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZIV vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

PZIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.49%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
PZIV Pzena International Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PZIV and EFAS in my portfolio?

PZIV and EFAS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PZIV or EFAS?

On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PZIV or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PZIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PZIV or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.00% for PZIV.

What is the main difference between PZIV and EFAS?

PZIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PZIV and 0.55% for EFAS.