PZIV vs. CIL
PZIV (Pzena International Value ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. PZIV is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. PZIV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.
Performance
PZIV vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZIV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
PZIV vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZIV Pzena International Value ETF | 13.24% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZIV vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
PZIV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CIL
PZIV vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena International Value ETF (PZIV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZIV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZIV vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZIV drawdown since its inception was -3.74%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIV and CIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZIV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -36.27% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.58% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -6.49% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility
PZIV vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZIV | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.34% | 7.41% | +7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 16.44% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 16.75% | -1.41% |
PZIV vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZIV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZIV vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
PZIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.05% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
PZIV Pzena International Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PZIV.
CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for PZIV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PZIV and 0.45% for CIL.
Find the right allocation for PZIV and CIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer