PYPY vs. SQY
PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -39.20% vs -0.20% for SQY. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.01% expense ratio.
Performance
PYPY vs. SQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -23.28% return, which is significantly lower than SQY's -1.01% return.
PYPY
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- -23.28%
- 6M
- -25.27%
- 1Y
- -39.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPY vs. SQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | -23.28% | -30.17% | 43.88% | 6.91% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.01% | -29.43% | 21.72% | 44.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPY and SQY is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between PYPY and SQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPY vs. SQY — Risk / Return Rank
PYPY
SQY
PYPY vs. SQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYPY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.03 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.01 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | -0.01 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYPY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | -0.01 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.19 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
PYPY vs. SQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SQY drawdown of -52.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and SQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -52.30% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.14% | -37.72% | -9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | -37.84% | -11.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -21.82% | +5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.44% | 17.18% | +9.26% |
Volatility
PYPY vs. SQY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) is 7.83%, while YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that PYPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPY | SQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 10.82% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.63% | 31.08% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.15% | 38.83% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 42.20% | -11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 42.20% | -11.10% |
PYPY vs. SQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PYPY and SQY have an expense ratio of 1.01%.
Dividends
PYPY vs. SQY - Dividend Comparison
PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.43%, less than SQY's 109.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 69.43% | 64.68% | 48.65% | 5.70% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 109.42% | 95.35% | 62.54% | 9.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPY and SQY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to PYPY (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs SQY's -52.30%.
On 1-year performance, SQY leads with -0.20% vs -39.20% for PYPY. Both ETFs have the same 1.01% expense ratio. On volatility, PYPY has been the lower-risk option at 7.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SQY has performed better with a -0.20% return vs -39.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYPY and SQY have the same expense ratio: 1.01% per year.
SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 69.43% for PYPY.
SQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPY and SQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer