PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYPY vs. FLMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PYPY vs. FLMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PYPY vs. FLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PYPY
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
-21.00%-30.17%43.88%6.09%
FLMB
Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF
-0.26%3.93%2.47%8.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -21.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLMB's -0.26% return.


PYPY

1D
0.78%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-21.00%
6M
-31.66%
1Y
-31.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLMB

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PYPY vs. FLMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PYPY vs. FLMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPY
PYPY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PYPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMB
FLMB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPY vs. FLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYPYFLMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.87

0.82

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.03

1.07

-2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.18

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

0.99

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.49

2.57

-4.05

PYPY vs. FLMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPY Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the FLMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPY and FLMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYPYFLMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

0.82

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.38

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between PYPY and FLMB is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PYPY vs. FLMB - Dividend Comparison

PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 76.78%, more than FLMB's 3.76% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYPY
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
76.78%64.68%48.65%5.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLMB
Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF
3.76%3.86%3.79%3.49%2.80%1.66%2.07%2.40%2.68%0.54%

Drawdowns

PYPY vs. FLMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than FLMB's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and FLMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPYFLMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-17.90%

-35.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.14%

-4.75%

-42.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.67%

-2.56%

-45.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.10%

-4.23%

-9.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.26%

1.83%

+19.43%

Volatility

PYPY vs. FLMB - Volatility Comparison

Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) at 1.60%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PYPYFLMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

1.60%

+7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.24%

2.16%

+28.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.97%

5.39%

+30.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.49%

5.08%

+26.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.49%

5.61%

+25.88%