PYPY vs. CONY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -40.84% vs -49.52% for CONY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CONY.

Performance

PYPY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PYPY having a -25.87% return and CONY slightly lower at -26.79%.

PYPY

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -5.94%
• YTD: -25.87%
• 6M: -26.73%
• 1Y: -40.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -11.77%
• YTD: -26.79%
• 6M: -30.97%
• 1Y: -49.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYPY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF	-25.87%	-30.17%	43.88%	6.19%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-26.79%	-26.34%	23.62%	89.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPY and CONY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2023	0.41

Return for Risk

PYPY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPY

PYPY Risk / Return Rank: 1
PYPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
PYPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PYPY Omega Ratio Rank: 0
PYPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PYPY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYPY	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.21	-0.86	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	-1.22	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	0.86	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.78	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	-1.24	-0.21

PYPY vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPY Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPY and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYPY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYPY	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.64%	-63.57%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.14%	-63.39%	+16.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.89%	-58.53%	+7.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.78%	-22.83%	+6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.18%	39.89%	-11.71%

Volatility

PYPY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) is 7.05%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that PYPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYPY	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.05%	15.74%	-8.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.78%	44.42%	-15.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.89%	57.79%	-23.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.95%	59.89%	-28.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.95%	59.89%	-28.94%

PYPY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYPY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.37%, less than CONY's 204.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	204.97%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF	75.37%	64.68%	48.65%	5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYPY and CONY in my portfolio?

PYPY and CONY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYPY or CONY?

CONY has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to PYPY (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs CONY's -63.57%.

Which ETF is better, PYPY or CONY?

On 1-year performance, PYPY leads with -40.84% vs -49.52% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, PYPY has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYPY or CONY?

Over the 1-year period, PYPY has performed better with a -40.84% return vs -49.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYPY or CONY?

CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYPY or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 204.97%, compared with 75.37% for PYPY.

What is the main difference between PYPY and CONY?

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.99% for CONY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.