PYPL vs. MLPX
PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, PYPL returned 2.02%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for MLPX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PYPL vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -26.77% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
PYPL
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- -26.77%
- 6M
- -28.80%
- 1Y
- -41.77%
- 3Y*
- -13.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
MLPX
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
PYPL vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -26.77% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.61% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPL and MLPX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PYPL and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPL vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
PYPL
MLPX
PYPL vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPL | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.27 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.92 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 6.98 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPL vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPL | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -70.67% | -16.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.92% | -8.18% | -41.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.34% | -16.77% | -40.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.30% | -19.72% | -67.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.30% | -64.70% | -22.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.11% | -5.67% | -80.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.02% | -16.58% | -19.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.56% | 3.42% | +26.14% |
Volatility
PYPL vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.79%. This indicates that PYPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPL | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.99% | 5.79% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.13% | 11.89% | +20.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.80% | 15.42% | +23.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.12% | 20.00% | +22.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.79% | 26.47% | +12.32% |
Dividends
PYPL vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MLPX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.99% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPL and MLPX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPL has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to MLPX (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPL dropped -87.30% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPL and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer