MLPX vs. VOO
MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.27%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
MLPX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.27% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.27%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
MLPX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 23.27%
- 6M
- 24.71%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
MLPX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.27% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPX and VOO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MLPX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MLPX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPX
VOO
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
MLPX
VOO
Utilities
MLPX
VOO
Basic Materials
MLPX
-
VOO
Communication Services
MLPX
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
MLPX
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
MLPX
-
VOO
Financial Services
MLPX
-
VOO
Healthcare
MLPX
-
VOO
Industrials
MLPX
-
VOO
Real Estate
MLPX
-
VOO
Technology
MLPX
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MLPX
VOO
MLPX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.02 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 13.58 | -6.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -33.99% | -36.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -8.90% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.77% | -18.69% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -24.52% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | -33.99% | -30.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -1.74% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -3.68% | -12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 1.98% | +1.41% |
Volatility
MLPX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that MLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 4.60% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 9.73% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 12.39% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 16.90% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 18.05% | +8.44% |
MLPX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.16% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPX and VOO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 12.27% for MLPX. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while VOO is S&P 500. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer