MLPX vs. VDE
MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.35%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for VDE. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
MLPX vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 26.75% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 35.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 12.35%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.
MLPX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 17.40%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- YTD
- 35.06%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.85M | $35.99M | $31.05M | |
| $73.73M | $73.82M | $109.36M |
MLPX vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26.75% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 35.06% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPX and VDE is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MLPX and VDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MLPX vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPX
VDE
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPX
VDE
Utilities
MLPX
VDE
Industrials
MLPX
VDE
Basic Materials
MLPX
-
VDE
Communication Services
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Financial Services
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Real Estate
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Technology
MLPX
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPX vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
MLPX
VDE
MLPX vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPX | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.75 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 7.42 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPX vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, roughly equal to the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPX | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -74.20% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -15.04% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.77% | -21.41% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -26.58% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | -69.29% | +4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -4.44% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -19.89% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 5.59% | -2.10% |
Volatility
MLPX vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 5.46%, while Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPX | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 5.99% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 16.66% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.68% | 20.95% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 26.14% | -6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 29.90% | -3.76% |
MLPX vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPX vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than VDE's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.05% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.40% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPX and VDE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to MLPX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.35% vs 10.12% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 2.40% for VDE.
MLPX is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.09% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPX and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer