PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPX vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MLPX having a 23.27% return and XLE slightly lower at 22.58%. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 12.27%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


MLPX

1D
1.07%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
23.27%
6M
24.71%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
20.93%
10Y*
12.27%

XLE

1D
1.26%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
22.58%
6M
23.97%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
23.27%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.58%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and XLE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013

0.78

The correlation between MLPX and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPX vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPX
XLE

Energy

99.5%
100.0%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

MLPX
99.5%
XLE
100.0%

Utilities

MLPX
0.3%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Industrials

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Technology

MLPX

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPXXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.88

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

5.70

+1.17

MLPX vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPXXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.67%

-71.26%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-14.05%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

-20.14%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-26.04%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

-66.81%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-12.96%

+7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-17.97%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

4.66%

-1.27%

Volatility

MLPX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 5.48%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPXXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

7.06%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

16.89%

-5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

20.96%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

25.98%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.49%

29.62%

-3.13%

MLPX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than XLE's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.16%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.47%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPX and XLE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to MLPX (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.27% vs 9.29% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.47% for XLE.

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while XLE is Energy Equities. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.08% for XLE.

MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPX and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer