MLPX vs. XLE
MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.27%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for XLE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
MLPX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MLPX having a 23.27% return and XLE slightly lower at 22.58%. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 12.27%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.
MLPX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 23.27%
- 6M
- 24.71%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
XLE
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 23.97%
- 1Y
- 26.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
MLPX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.27% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 22.58% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPX and XLE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MLPX and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MLPX vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPX
XLE
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPX
XLE
Utilities
MLPX
XLE
-
Basic Materials
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Communication Services
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Financial Services
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Industrials
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Technology
MLPX
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
MLPX
XLE
MLPX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.88 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 5.70 | +1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -71.26% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -14.05% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.77% | -20.14% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -26.04% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | -66.81% | +2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -12.96% | +7.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -17.97% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 4.66% | -1.27% |
Volatility
MLPX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 5.48%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 7.06% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 16.89% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 20.96% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 25.98% | -6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 29.62% | -3.13% |
MLPX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than XLE's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.16% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPX and XLE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to MLPX (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.27% vs 9.29% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.47% for XLE.
MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while XLE is Energy Equities. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.08% for XLE.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPX and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer