PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYFRX vs. PYACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than PYACX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has outperformed PYACX with an annualized return of 5.02%, while PYACX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.94% annualized return.


PYFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.01%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
5.02%

PYACX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.52%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
0.27%7.39%3.17%8.53%-16.33%-0.08%8.64%14.46%-3.05%8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PYFRX and PYACX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYFRX vs. PYACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

PYACX
PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYFRXPYACXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.93

1.24

+1.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

1.80

+4.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.09

5.52

+22.57

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYFRX Sharpe Ratio is 5.26, which is higher than the PYACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYFRX and PYACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYFRXPYACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26

1.35

+3.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.23

0.08

+3.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.39

0.50

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.80

+0.59

Drawdowns

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum PYACX drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and PYACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYFRXPYACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-22.90%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-3.20%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-6.43%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.80%

-22.90%

+18.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

-22.90%

+2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.58%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-3.84%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

1.04%

-0.81%

Volatility

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) is 0.32%, while Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that PYFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYFRXPYACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

1.49%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

3.20%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23%

4.28%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.95%

6.65%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

5.87%

-2.25%

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PYACX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYFRX vs. PYACX - Dividend Comparison

PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than PYACX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
4.60%4.54%4.59%3.89%3.35%5.32%3.87%3.37%3.65%3.92%5.49%4.36%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.04%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYFRX and PYACX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYACX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to PYFRX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYFRX dropped -20.18% vs PYACX's -22.90%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.26 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYFRX and PYACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer