PYFRX vs. BGHSX

In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than BGHSX's 0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has outperformed BGHSX with an annualized return of 4.51%, while BGHSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PYFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the BGHSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYFRX and BGHSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than BGHSX's 7.54% yield.

The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.17%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and BGHSX.

The current volatility for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) is 0.89%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that PYFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.