PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYACX vs. PKBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PKBIX's 1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has underperformed PKBIX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while PKBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.60% annualized return.


PYACX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.46%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
2.96%

PKBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.41%
6M
2.06%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
3.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
0.47%7.39%3.17%8.53%-16.33%-0.08%8.64%14.46%-3.05%8.53%
PKBIX
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund
1.41%6.75%8.14%6.21%-3.89%3.97%1.89%6.36%0.79%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PYACX and PKBIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.35

Over the past year, PYACX and PKBIX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYACX vs. PKBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYACX
PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PKBIX
PKBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PKBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PKBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYACXPKBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

2.98

-1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

4.63

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.67

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.13

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

13.35

-7.61

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the PKBIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYACX and PKBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYACXPKBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.98

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

1.48

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

1.08

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.12

-0.32

Drawdowns

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than PKBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PKBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYACXPKBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-19.17%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-1.90%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-2.11%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.90%

-7.05%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.90%

-19.17%

-3.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

0.00%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-0.92%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.44%

+0.60%

Volatility

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) at 0.56%. This indicates that PYACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYACXPKBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.56%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

1.59%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

1.97%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

2.60%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

3.33%

+2.54%

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PKBIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYACX vs. PKBIX - Dividend Comparison

PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than PKBIX's 8.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKBIX
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund
8.14%8.25%6.95%5.55%1.94%2.18%3.57%3.32%3.27%2.50%1.70%2.00%
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
4.59%4.54%4.59%3.89%3.35%5.32%3.87%3.37%3.65%3.92%5.49%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYACX and PKBIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYACX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to PKBIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PKBIX's -19.17%.

PKBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYACX and PKBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer