PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYACX vs. PYGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than PYGFX's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has outperformed PYGFX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while PYGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


PYACX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.46%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
2.89%

PYGFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
0.37%7.39%3.17%8.53%-16.33%-0.08%8.64%14.46%-3.05%8.53%
PYGFX
Payden Global Fixed Income Fund
0.54%5.20%3.90%7.34%-12.37%-0.89%5.92%8.61%-0.26%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PYACX and PYGFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.76

The correlation between PYACX and PYGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYACX vs. PYGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYACX
PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGFX
PYGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PYGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYACXPYGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.16

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

3.43

+1.23

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the PYGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYACX and PYGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than PYGFX's maximum drawdown of -15.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PYGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYACXPYGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-15.94%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-3.20%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-4.25%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.90%

-15.94%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.90%

-15.94%

-6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.34%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.07%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.08%

-0.01%

Volatility

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX) at 1.04%. This indicates that PYACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYACXPYGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.04%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

2.62%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

3.11%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

4.34%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

3.67%

+2.21%

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PYGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYACX vs. PYGFX - Dividend Comparison

PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than PYGFX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
4.60%4.54%4.59%3.89%3.35%5.32%3.87%3.37%3.65%3.92%5.49%4.36%
PYGFX
Payden Global Fixed Income Fund
4.07%3.88%3.69%2.71%8.25%3.18%2.69%3.07%5.39%1.91%1.48%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYACX and PYGFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYACX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to PYGFX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PYGFX's -15.94%.

PYGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYACX and PYGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer