PYACX vs. PRPIX
PYACX (Payden Corporate Bond Fund) and PRPIX (T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PYACX returned 2.89%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for PRPIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PYACX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PRPIX.
Performance
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than PRPIX's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has underperformed PRPIX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while PRPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.17% annualized return.
PYACX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
PRPIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYACX Payden Corporate Bond Fund | 0.37% | 7.39% | 3.17% | 8.53% | -16.33% | -0.08% | 8.64% | 14.46% | -3.05% | 8.53% |
PRPIX T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund | 0.02% | 9.21% | 6.49% | 12.72% | -17.71% | -0.76% | 7.87% | 15.77% | -3.05% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYACX and PRPIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PYACX and PRPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYACX vs. PRPIX — Risk / Return Rank
PYACX
PRPIX
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYACX | PRPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.53 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.66 | 5.12 | -0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum PRPIX drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PRPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYACX | PRPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -24.24% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.20% | -3.29% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.43% | -5.67% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.90% | -24.24% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.90% | -24.24% | +1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.16% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -2.87% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.98% | +0.09% |
Volatility
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) is 1.10%, while T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) has a volatility of 1.18%. This indicates that PYACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYACX | PRPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.18% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 3.13% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 4.14% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 6.65% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 6.06% | -0.18% |
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYACX vs. PRPIX - Dividend Comparison
PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than PRPIX's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPIX T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund | 4.68% | 5.87% | 8.35% | 7.54% | 2.42% | 5.61% | 3.82% | 5.47% | 3.47% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 4.23% |
PYACX Payden Corporate Bond Fund | 4.60% | 4.54% | 4.59% | 3.89% | 3.35% | 5.32% | 3.87% | 3.37% | 3.65% | 3.92% | 5.49% | 4.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYACX and PRPIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRPIX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to PYACX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PRPIX's -24.24%.
PRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYACX and PRPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer