PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYACX vs. PIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than PIMIX's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has underperformed PIMIX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while PIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.44% annualized return.


PYACX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.45%
6M
-1.26%
YTD
-0.90%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
2.52%
ALL TIME*
4.18%

PIMIX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
0.23%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
4.44%
ALL TIME*
6.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
-0.90%7.39%3.17%8.53%-16.33%-0.08%8.64%14.46%-3.05%8.53%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
0.23%11.08%5.45%9.36%-9.07%2.62%5.84%8.10%0.63%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PYACX and PIMIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.56

Over the past year, PYACX and PIMIX have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYACX vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYACX
PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PIMIX
PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYACXPIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.59

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

5.07

-3.10

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the PIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYACX and PIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than PIMIX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYACXPIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-13.39%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-3.69%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.29%

-3.69%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.90%

-13.34%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.90%

-13.39%

-9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-1.69%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-1.68%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.15%

+0.04%

Volatility

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) is 1.05%, while PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that PYACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYACXPIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

3.55%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

4.14%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

4.89%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

4.26%

+1.61%

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PIMIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYACX vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison

PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than PIMIX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
5.32%6.01%6.27%6.21%4.98%4.02%4.88%5.83%5.66%5.37%5.52%7.88%
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
4.72%4.54%4.59%3.89%3.35%5.32%3.87%3.37%3.65%3.92%5.49%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYACX and PIMIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIMIX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to PYACX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PIMIX's -13.39%.

PIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYACX and PIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer