PortfoliosLab logo
PYFRX vs. MNHYX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PYFRX and MNHYX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%65.00%70.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
61.95%
69.39%
PYFRX
MNHYX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PYFRX:

3.12

MNHYX:

2.11

Sortino Ratio

PYFRX:

3.91

MNHYX:

2.74

Omega Ratio

PYFRX:

2.11

MNHYX:

1.48

Calmar Ratio

PYFRX:

2.28

MNHYX:

1.69

Martin Ratio

PYFRX:

11.16

MNHYX:

7.22

Ulcer Index

PYFRX:

0.54%

MNHYX:

1.04%

Daily Std Dev

PYFRX:

1.95%

MNHYX:

3.53%

Max Drawdown

PYFRX:

-20.17%

MNHYX:

-19.69%

Current Drawdown

PYFRX:

-0.76%

MNHYX:

-2.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than MNHYX's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 4.49%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.30% annualized return.


PYFRX

YTD

0.28%

1M

1.30%

6M

1.70%

1Y

5.95%

5Y*

7.46%

10Y*

4.49%

MNHYX

YTD

0.05%

1M

1.30%

6M

0.84%

1Y

6.29%

5Y*

8.14%

10Y*

5.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PYFRX vs. MNHYX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYFRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PYFRX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PYFRX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PYFRX is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PYFRX is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PYFRX is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PYFRX is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MNHYX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNHYX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNHYX is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNHYX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNHYX is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNHYX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNHYX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PYFRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the MNHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYFRX and MNHYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.0010.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.12
2.11
PYFRX
MNHYX

Dividends

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison

PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than MNHYX's 7.30% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
8.78%8.88%8.35%5.07%2.95%3.22%4.44%4.22%3.31%3.53%3.19%3.03%
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
7.30%6.39%6.66%5.93%7.93%4.98%6.63%5.26%5.16%6.49%5.60%8.13%

Drawdowns

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.17%, roughly equal to the maximum MNHYX drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and MNHYX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.76%
-2.06%
PYFRX
MNHYX

Volatility

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) is 1.46%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that PYFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.46%
2.25%
PYFRX
MNHYX