PYFRX vs. MNHYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PYFRX (Payden Floating Rate Fund) and MNHYX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series) are both mutual funds - PYFRX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Paydenfunds, while MNHYX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX returned 5.02%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for MNHYX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYFRX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MNHYX.

Performance

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than MNHYX's 2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 5.02%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.65% annualized return.

PYFRX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 6.55%
• 3Y*: 8.51%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 5.02%

MNHYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 3.68%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 9.41%
• 5Y*: 5.62%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYFRX Payden Floating Rate Fund	1.52%	6.61%	8.90%	12.86%	0.27%	3.93%	1.72%	8.49%	0.31%	2.82%
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series	2.68%	6.65%	9.63%	13.19%	-7.59%	9.99%	6.26%	13.99%	-1.30%	8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PYFRX and MNHYX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.47

Return for Risk

PYFRX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYFRX

PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 98
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

MNHYX

MNHYX Risk / Return Rank: 88
MNHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MNHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MNHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MNHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MNHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYFRX	MNHYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.34	3.14	+2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	9.61	4.77	+4.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.96	1.74	+1.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.89	3.45	+3.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	29.00	15.53	+13.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYFRX Sharpe Ratio is 5.34, which is higher than the MNHYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYFRX and MNHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYFRX	MNHYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.34	3.14	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	3.23	1.53	+1.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.39	1.61	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	1.84	-0.44

Drawdowns

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, roughly equal to the maximum MNHYX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and MNHYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYFRX	MNHYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.18%	-19.70%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.97%	-2.51%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.66%	-4.43%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.80%	-10.84%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.18%	-19.70%	-0.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.59%	-1.56%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.23%	0.56%	-0.33%

Volatility

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) is 0.33%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that PYFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYFRX	MNHYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	0.77%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.03%	2.12%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23%	2.74%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.95%	3.70%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.62%	4.15%	-0.53%

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYFRX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison

PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than MNHYX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series	6.65%	6.95%	6.38%	6.66%	5.93%	7.93%	4.98%	6.63%	5.26%	5.16%	6.49%	5.60%
PYFRX Payden Floating Rate Fund	7.04%	7.55%	8.88%	8.35%	5.08%	2.94%	3.19%	4.45%	4.22%	3.30%	3.53%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYFRX and MNHYX in my portfolio?

PYFRX and MNHYX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYFRX or MNHYX?

MNHYX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to PYFRX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYFRX dropped -20.18% vs MNHYX's -19.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.34 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.