PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYACX vs. PYLMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PYLMX's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has outperformed PYLMX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while PYLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.


PYACX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.91%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.26%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.96%

PYLMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
0.47%7.39%3.17%8.53%-16.33%-0.08%8.64%14.46%-3.05%8.53%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
1.39%5.22%6.08%5.34%0.56%0.19%1.85%3.34%1.76%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PYACX and PYLMX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.28

The correlation between PYACX and PYLMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYACX vs. PYLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYACX
PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLMX
PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYACXPYLMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

2.96

-1.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

8.04

-5.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.49

-1.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

8.87

-6.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.85

38.00

-32.15

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the PYLMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYACX and PYLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYACXPYLMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.96

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

2.74

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

2.13

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

2.39

-1.59

Drawdowns

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than PYLMX's maximum drawdown of -5.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PYLMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYACXPYLMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-5.56%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-0.52%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-0.52%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.90%

-1.24%

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.90%

-5.56%

-17.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

0.00%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-0.16%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.12%

+0.92%

Volatility

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) at 0.48%. This indicates that PYACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYACXPYLMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.48%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

1.09%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

1.56%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

1.36%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

1.31%

+4.56%

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYACX vs. PYLMX - Dividend Comparison

PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than PYLMX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
4.59%4.54%4.59%3.89%3.35%5.32%3.87%3.37%3.65%3.92%5.49%4.36%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
4.51%4.96%5.36%3.79%1.83%0.50%1.39%2.54%2.28%1.42%0.91%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYACX and PYLMX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYACX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to PYLMX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PYLMX's -5.56%.

PYLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYACX and PYLMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer