PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYACX vs. PYFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYACX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PYFRX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PYACX has underperformed PYFRX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while PYFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.02% annualized return.


PYACX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.46%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
2.96%

PYFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.11%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
0.47%7.39%3.17%8.53%-16.33%-0.08%8.64%14.46%-3.05%8.53%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.52%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PYACX and PYFRX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYACX vs. PYFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYACX
PYACX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PYACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PYACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYACXPYFRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

5.34

-3.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

9.61

-7.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

2.96

-1.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

6.81

-4.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

28.58

-22.83

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the PYFRX Sharpe Ratio of 5.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYACX and PYFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYACXPYFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

5.34

-3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

3.23

-3.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

1.39

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.39

-0.58

Drawdowns

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYACX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than PYFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYACX and PYFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYACXPYFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-20.18%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-0.97%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-2.66%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.90%

-4.80%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.90%

-20.18%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

0.00%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-0.59%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.23%

+0.81%

Volatility

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Corporate Bond Fund (PYACX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) at 0.33%. This indicates that PYACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYACXPYFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.33%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

1.02%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

1.23%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

1.95%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

3.62%

+2.25%

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYACX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PYFRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYACX vs. PYFRX - Dividend Comparison

PYACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than PYFRX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYACX
Payden Corporate Bond Fund
4.59%4.54%4.59%3.89%3.35%5.32%3.87%3.37%3.65%3.92%5.49%4.36%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.04%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYACX and PYFRX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYACX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to PYFRX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYACX dropped -22.90% vs PYFRX's -20.18%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.34 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYACX and PYFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer