PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLMX vs. PYGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLMX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than PYGFX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PYLMX has outperformed PYGFX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while PYGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.85% annualized return.


PYLMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.27%
YTD
1.65%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
2.77%
ALL TIME*
2.86%

PYGFX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.84%
6M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.85%
ALL TIME*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
1.65%5.22%6.08%5.34%0.56%0.19%1.85%3.34%1.76%1.64%
PYGFX
Payden Global Fixed Income Fund
-0.08%5.20%3.90%7.34%-12.37%-0.89%5.92%8.61%-0.26%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLMX and PYGFX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLMX vs. PYGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYLMX
PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGFX
PYGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PYGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYLMXPYGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.38

1.14

+1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.60

0.75

+6.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.75

2.01

+30.75

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the PYGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLMX and PYGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLMX drawdown since its inception was -5.56%, smaller than the maximum PYGFX drawdown of -15.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLMX and PYGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLMXPYGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-15.94%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-3.20%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.52%

-3.55%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.24%

-15.94%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.56%

-15.94%

+10.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.94%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-2.07%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

1.19%

-1.07%

Volatility

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) is 0.15%, while Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that PYLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLMXPYGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

0.76%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

2.68%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

3.13%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.37%

4.35%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.31%

3.66%

-2.35%

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PYGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLMX vs. PYGFX - Dividend Comparison

PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than PYGFX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYGFX
Payden Global Fixed Income Fund
4.15%3.88%3.69%2.71%8.25%3.18%2.69%3.07%5.39%1.91%1.48%3.00%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
4.09%4.96%5.36%3.79%1.83%0.50%1.39%2.54%2.28%1.42%0.91%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYLMX and PYGFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYGFX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to PYLMX (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLMX dropped -5.56% vs PYGFX's -15.94%.

PYLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLMX and PYGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer