PYLMX vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYLMX (Payden Limited Maturity Fund) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both funds - PYLMX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Paydenfunds, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 10 years, PYLMX returned 2.77%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYLMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLMX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PYLMX has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 2.77%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.51% annualized return.

PYLMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 2.77%

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund	1.39%	5.22%	6.08%	5.34%	0.56%	0.19%	1.85%	3.34%	1.76%	1.64%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.91%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.74%	0.55%	1.44%	5.70%	0.30%	2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLMX and FLTR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2011	0.03

Return for Risk

PYLMX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLMX

PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 97
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYLMX	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	6.77	-3.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	8.04	12.78	-4.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.49	3.15	-0.66
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.87	16.96	-8.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.00	101.23	-63.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLMX and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYLMX	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	6.77	-3.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.74	2.11	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.13	0.70	+1.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	0.53	+1.87

Drawdowns

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLMX drawdown since its inception was -5.56%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLMX and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYLMX	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-17.84%	+12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.52%	-0.31%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.52%	-1.93%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.24%	-3.06%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-5.56%	-17.84%	+12.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-0.67%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	0.05%	+0.07%

Volatility

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that PYLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYLMX	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.25%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.09%	0.62%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56%	0.79%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.36%	2.13%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.31%	5.00%	-3.69%

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PYLMX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than FLTR's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund	4.51%	4.96%	5.36%	3.79%	1.83%	0.50%	1.39%	2.54%	2.28%	1.42%	0.91%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYLMX and FLTR in my portfolio?

PYLMX and FLTR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYLMX or FLTR?

PYLMX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLMX dropped -5.56% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.