PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PY vs. PWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PY vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed PWV with an annualized return of 10.73%, while PWV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.


PY

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.70%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.52%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.73%

PWV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.43%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PY
Principal Value ETF
4.14%7.74%16.79%9.11%-5.10%34.83%2.71%26.87%-13.34%18.87%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
12.10%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and PWV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.69

The correlation between PY and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PY vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYPWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

6.28

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

21.16

-13.43

PY vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYPWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.74

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.88

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.41

+0.12

Drawdowns

PY vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and PWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-49.04%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-4.05%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

-14.31%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-16.36%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

-37.67%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.51%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-9.50%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.20%

+0.65%

Volatility

PY vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

Principal Value ETF (PY) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) have volatilities of 2.28% and 2.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYPWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.35%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

6.62%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

9.31%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

14.35%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

17.16%

+2.91%

PY vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PY vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than PWV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.13%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PY and PWV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWV has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to PY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs PWV's -49.04%.

On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 11.81% vs 10.73% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.81% for PWV.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.58% for PWV.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PY and PWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer