PY vs. PWV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PY (Principal Value ETF) and PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PY is actively managed, while PWV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PY returned 10.81%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for PWV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PWV.

Performance

PY vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 15.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed PWV with an annualized return of 10.81%, while PWV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.

PY

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 2.76%
• 1Y: 12.67%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

PWV

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PY Principal Value ETF	3.40%	7.74%	16.79%	9.11%	-5.10%	34.83%	2.71%	26.87%	-13.34%	18.87%
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF	15.98%	19.65%	14.48%	10.36%	-1.16%	29.06%	-3.77%	29.84%	-14.12%	16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and PWV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2016	0.69

The correlation between PY and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PY vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY

PY Risk / Return Rank: 39
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

PWV

PWV Risk / Return Rank: 91
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PY	PWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.92	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	4.21	-2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.52	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	6.86	-4.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.83	22.94	-16.11

PY vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PY vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and PWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PY	PWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.44%	-49.04%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-4.05%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.84%	-14.31%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.84%	-16.36%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.44%	-37.67%	-7.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-0.05%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-9.48%	+4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.21%	+0.65%

Volatility

PY vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.75%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PY	PWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	3.42%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	7.04%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	9.57%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	14.33%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.08%	17.15%	+2.93%

PY vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PY vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than PWV's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF	1.73%	2.12%	2.08%	2.16%	2.29%	1.89%	2.66%	2.24%	2.34%	1.55%	2.35%	2.42%
PY Principal Value ETF	2.15%	2.14%	2.22%	2.68%	3.02%	2.83%	2.95%	2.25%	2.34%	1.68%	1.85%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PY and PWV in my portfolio?

PY and PWV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PY or PWV?

PWV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to PY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs PWV's -49.04%.

Which ETF is better, PY or PWV?

On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 12.39% vs 10.81% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PY or PWV?

Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PY or PWV?

PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PY or PWV?

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.73% for PWV.

What is the main difference between PY and PWV?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.58% for PWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.