PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PY vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.78%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


PY

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.77%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.78%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PY
Principal Value ETF
4.65%7.74%16.79%9.11%-5.10%34.83%2.71%26.87%-13.34%18.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and VOO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.61

The correlation between PY and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PY vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PY
VOO

Technology

25.0%
35.7%

Financial Services

16.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
10.2%

Industrials

9.3%
8.3%

Energy

5.6%
3.5%

Communication Services

5.1%
11.3%

Utilities

1.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

PY
25.0%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

PY
16.5%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

PY
12.0%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

PY
11.5%
VOO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PY
11.0%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

PY
9.3%
VOO
8.3%

Energy

PY
5.6%
VOO
3.5%

Communication Services

PY
5.1%
VOO
11.3%

Utilities

PY
1.7%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

PY
1.2%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

PY
1.1%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

2.53

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

3.43

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.42

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.52

15.95

-7.43

PY vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.53

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.85

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.89

-0.35

Drawdowns

PY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-33.99%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-8.90%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

-18.69%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-24.52%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

-33.99%

-11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-3.69%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.91%

-0.06%

Volatility

PY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.38%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

2.74%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

8.88%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.78%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.81%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

18.01%

+2.07%

PY vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.12%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PY and VOO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to PY (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 10.78% for PY. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PY.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PY and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer