PY vs. SCHK
PY (Principal Value ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while SCHK is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index. PY is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PY returned 8.75%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for SCHK. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
PY vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 10.36% return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.96%
SCHK
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 21.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $948.19K | $783.01K | $811.97K | |
| $28.76M | $27.18M | $27.56M |
PY vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 9.01% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 7.42% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 10.36% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and SCHK is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PY and SCHK shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
SCHK
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
PY
SCHK
Financial Services
PY
SCHK
Healthcare
PY
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
PY
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
PY
SCHK
Industrials
PY
SCHK
Energy
PY
SCHK
Communication Services
PY
SCHK
Utilities
PY
SCHK
Basic Materials
PY
SCHK
Real Estate
PY
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
PY
SCHK
PY vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PY | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.17 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | 9.29 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PY vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than SCHK's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -34.80% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -8.97% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -19.21% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -25.44% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.35% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.12% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.09% | -0.26% |
Volatility
PY vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Principal Value ETF (PY) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 3.51% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 10.29% | -2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.65% | 13.13% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 17.34% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 19.04% | +1.04% |
PY vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PY vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than SCHK's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and SCHK have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHK has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to PY (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 12.06% vs 8.75% for PY. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PY.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.04% for SCHK.
PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHK is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.03% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer