PY vs. SCHD
PY (Principal Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. PY is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PY returned 10.78%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
PY vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.78%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
PY vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.65% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and SCHD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PY and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
PY
SCHD
Financial Services
PY
SCHD
Healthcare
PY
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
PY
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
PY
SCHD
Industrials
PY
SCHD
Energy
PY
SCHD
Communication Services
PY
SCHD
Utilities
PY
SCHD
Basic Materials
PY
SCHD
Real Estate
PY
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PY
SCHD
PY vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PY | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 2.57 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 3.98 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 6.17 | -3.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 15.20 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PY | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.57 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.77 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
PY vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -33.37% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -4.61% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -16.13% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -16.85% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | -33.37% | -12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -1.40% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -3.32% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.87% | -0.02% |
Volatility
PY vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.38%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 2.92% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 7.66% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 10.96% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 14.38% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 16.72% | +3.36% |
PY vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PY vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and SCHD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to PY (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 10.78% for PY. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PY.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.12% for PY.
PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer