PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQ vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXQ vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 54.15% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has outperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 21.11%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively lower 17.93% annualized return.


PXQ

1D
-5.38%
1M
5.48%
YTD
54.15%
6M
54.94%
1Y
84.85%
3Y*
40.93%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
21.11%

CIBR

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
18.06%
6M
15.86%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXQ vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
54.15%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
18.06%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQ and CIBR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between PXQ and CIBR has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXQ vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXQ
CIBR

Technology

84.4%
95.4%

Communication Services

11.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

3.2%

-

Industrials

0.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PXQ
84.4%
CIBR
95.4%

Communication Services

PXQ
11.4%
CIBR
1.9%

Real Estate

PXQ
3.2%
CIBR

-

Industrials

PXQ
0.8%
CIBR
2.7%

Financial Services

PXQ
0.0%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

PXQ

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXQ

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

PXQ

-

CIBR

-

Energy

PXQ

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

PXQ

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

PXQ

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXQ vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXQ vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXQCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.12

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

0.69

+6.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.00

1.60

+28.40

PXQ vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQ and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXQ vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-33.89%

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-21.99%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-21.99%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-33.89%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-33.89%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.27%

-10.72%

+4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-8.66%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

9.51%

-6.67%

Volatility

PXQ vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 15.64% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 12.03%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXQCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.64%

12.03%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.75%

21.54%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.15%

25.21%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.96%

25.07%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.33%

23.60%

-0.27%

PXQ vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXQ vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than CIBR's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.49%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.62%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXQ and CIBR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQ has higher volatility (15.64%) compared to CIBR (12.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, PXQ leads with 21.11% vs 17.93% for CIBR. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CIBR has been the lower-risk option at 12.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 17.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.

PXQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.60% for CIBR.

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXQ and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer