PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQ vs. FDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXQ vs. FDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 64.46% return, which is significantly higher than FDN's 6.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has outperformed FDN with an annualized return of 21.50%, while FDN has yielded a comparatively lower 14.59% annualized return.


PXQ

1D
2.22%
1M
27.63%
YTD
64.46%
6M
64.45%
1Y
102.54%
3Y*
43.66%
5Y*
22.20%
10Y*
21.50%

FDN

1D
-1.35%
1M
7.41%
YTD
6.19%
6M
5.23%
1Y
12.94%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
14.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXQ vs. FDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
64.46%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
6.19%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQ and FDN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006

0.78

The correlation between PXQ and FDN shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXQ vs. FDN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXQ
FDN

Technology

83.7%
37.7%

Communication Services

11.8%
29.7%

Real Estate

3.2%

-

Industrials

0.9%
1.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

27.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PXQ
83.7%
FDN
37.7%

Communication Services

PXQ
11.8%
FDN
29.7%

Real Estate

PXQ
3.2%
FDN

-

Industrials

PXQ
0.9%
FDN
1.4%

Financial Services

PXQ
0.2%
FDN
2.4%

Basic Materials

PXQ

-

FDN

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXQ

-

FDN
27.7%

Consumer Defensive

PXQ

-

FDN

-

Energy

PXQ

-

FDN

-

Healthcare

PXQ

-

FDN
1.1%

Utilities

PXQ

-

FDN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXQ vs. FDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXQ vs. FDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXQFDNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.85

0.69

+4.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.85

1.03

+4.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.13

+0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.32

0.65

+9.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.42

1.65

+43.77

PXQ vs. FDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQ Sharpe Ratio is 4.85, which is higher than the FDN Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQ and FDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXQFDNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85

0.69

+4.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.18

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.57

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.55

+0.03

Drawdowns

PXQ vs. FDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, smaller than the maximum FDN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and FDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQFDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-61.55%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-21.31%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-24.98%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-53.97%

+19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-53.97%

+19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.35%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-11.83%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

8.35%

-6.08%

Volatility

PXQ vs. FDN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) at 4.64%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXQFDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.05%

4.64%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.13%

14.31%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

18.95%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

27.25%

-4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

25.60%

-2.63%

PXQ vs. FDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FDN's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXQ vs. FDN - Dividend Comparison

PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.57%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXQ and FDN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQ has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to FDN (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs FDN's -61.55%.

On 10-year performance, PXQ leads with 21.50% vs 14.59% for FDN. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 14.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for FDN.

PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

PXQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDN is Large Cap Growth Equities. PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.52% for FDN.

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXQ and FDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer