PXJ vs. RSP
PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXJ returned -0.80%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
PXJ vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 46.18% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of -0.80%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.
PXJ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 46.18%
- 6M
- 38.54%
- 1Y
- 82.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
PXJ vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 46.18% | 8.74% | 0.21% | 14.44% | 62.25% | 11.28% | -44.31% | -0.32% | -39.82% | -23.08% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXJ and RSP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXJ and RSP has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PXJ vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXJ
RSP
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
PXJ
RSP
Industrials
PXJ
RSP
Utilities
PXJ
RSP
Financial Services
PXJ
RSP
Basic Materials
PXJ
-
RSP
Communication Services
PXJ
-
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
PXJ
-
RSP
Consumer Defensive
PXJ
-
RSP
Healthcare
PXJ
-
RSP
Real Estate
PXJ
-
RSP
Technology
PXJ
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXJ vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
PXJ
RSP
PXJ vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.24 | 2.49 | +5.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.98 | 9.48 | +14.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | 1.70 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.65 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.57 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
PXJ vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than RSP's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.82% | -59.92% | -34.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -7.85% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.03% | -17.81% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.03% | -21.38% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.72% | -39.04% | -48.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.60% | -0.38% | -66.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -6.65% | -49.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.06% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PXJ vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that PXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 2.56% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 8.29% | +10.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 11.56% | +14.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 16.18% | +18.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.47% | 18.35% | +21.12% |
PXJ vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXJ vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 2.21% | 2.91% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.65% | 2.40% | 4.72% | 1.87% | 0.99% | 2.75% | 1.18% | 2.36% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXJ and RSP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXJ has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs -0.80% for PXJ. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.
PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.20% for RSP.
PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXJ and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer