PXJ vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. PXJ is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

PXJ vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 41.36% return, which is significantly higher than POW's 38.93% return.

PXJ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -6.30%
• 6M: 29.86%
• YTD: 41.36%
• 1Y: 62.95%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 20.43%
• 10Y*: -1.35%

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	41.36%	2.02%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and POW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

PXJ vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 84
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PXJ	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.34	—	—

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXJ	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.82%	-18.37%	-76.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.70%	-18.37%	-49.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.72%	-4.33%	-51.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PXJ	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.83%	32.94%	-6.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	32.94%	+1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.20%	32.94%	+6.26%

PXJ vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXJ vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.47%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXJ and POW in my portfolio?

PXJ and POW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PXJ or POW?

On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXJ or POW?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXJ or POW?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between PXJ and POW?

PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.75% for POW.