PXJ vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. PXJ is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PXJ returned 62.95% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 41.36% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

PXJ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -6.30%
• 6M: 29.86%
• YTD: 41.36%
• 1Y: 62.95%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 20.43%
• 10Y*: -1.35%

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	41.36%	8.74%	-3.96%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and MSTZ is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.22

Return for Risk

PXJ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 84
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PXJ	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.92	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.45	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.35	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.34	6.53	+5.81

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXJ	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.82%	-99.38%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-84.89%	+66.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.70%	-97.39%	+29.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.72%	-94.53%	+38.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	43.51%	-38.34%

Volatility

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is 8.58%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that PXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXJ	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	56.56%	-47.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.21%	135.11%	-115.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.83%	148.53%	-121.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	171.02%	-136.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.20%	171.02%	-131.82%

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXJ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.47%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXJ and MSTZ in my portfolio?

PXJ and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXJ or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to PXJ (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, PXJ or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 62.95% for PXJ. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXJ or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 62.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXJ or MSTZ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXJ or MSTZ?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between PXJ and MSTZ?

PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.