PXH vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.44%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for FNDF. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

PXH vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 10.44%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.

PXH

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -3.27%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.41%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 10.44%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 17.34%
• 6M: 20.48%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 12.75%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	10.39%	31.44%	12.09%	13.93%	-15.18%	8.31%	-1.91%	16.77%	-8.68%	26.60%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	17.34%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and FNDF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.76

The correlation between PXH and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXH vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PXH	FNDF
Financial Services	25.8%	16.7%
Technology	19.9%	11.1%
Energy	13.0%	12.3%
Basic Materials	12.1%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.7%
Communication Services	6.2%	4.9%
Industrials	4.6%	15.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	6.9%
Utilities	2.4%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.9%
Healthcare	0.9%	5.5%

Return for Risk

PXH vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH

PXH Risk / Return Rank: 63
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PXH	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.53	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	3.26	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.45	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.71	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.56	14.05	-3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PXH vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PXH	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.53	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.79	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.67	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.52	-0.38

Drawdowns

PXH vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXH	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.63%	-40.14%	-23.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.24%	-10.60%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.72%	-13.89%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.59%	-25.56%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.42%	-40.14%	-0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.27%	-3.84%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.86%	-7.64%	-9.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.80%	-0.01%

Volatility

PXH vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 6.06% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXH	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	5.97%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	13.19%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.75%	15.60%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.84%	16.28%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.08%	17.71%	+2.37%

PXH vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXH vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FNDF's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.93%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	3.57%	4.02%	4.43%	4.84%	5.33%	4.69%	2.79%	3.28%	3.30%	2.74%	1.97%	3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXH and FNDF in my portfolio?

PXH and FNDF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXH or FNDF?

PXH has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FNDF (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, PXH or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.78% vs 10.44% for PXH. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXH or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXH or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXH or FNDF?

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.93% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between PXH and FNDF?

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.