PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. DBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 27.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PXH having a 10.53% annualized return and DBEM not far ahead at 10.69%.


PXH

1D
-2.63%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
10.82%
6M
11.08%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.53%

DBEM

1D
-5.21%
1M
2.97%
YTD
27.92%
6M
28.44%
1Y
54.61%
3Y*
24.78%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
10.82%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
27.92%30.42%10.61%10.53%-17.00%-2.26%18.12%16.77%-10.81%27.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and DBEM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.82

The correlation between PXH and DBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXH vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
DBEM

Financial Services

24.8%
17.9%

Technology

24.5%
43.6%

Basic Materials

11.8%
6.0%

Energy

11.5%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
8.4%

Communication Services

5.9%
6.1%

Industrials

4.4%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
2.5%

Utilities

2.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Healthcare

0.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

PXH
24.8%
DBEM
17.9%

Technology

PXH
24.5%
DBEM
43.6%

Basic Materials

PXH
11.8%
DBEM
6.0%

Energy

PXH
11.5%
DBEM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
9.8%
DBEM
8.4%

Communication Services

PXH
5.9%
DBEM
6.1%

Industrials

PXH
4.4%
DBEM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.7%
DBEM
2.5%

Utilities

PXH
2.2%
DBEM
1.8%

Real Estate

PXH
1.7%
DBEM
1.0%

Healthcare

PXH
0.8%
DBEM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEM
DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXHDBEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

5.22

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

19.15

-9.10

PXH vs. DBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the DBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and DBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXH vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and DBEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHDBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-33.51%

-30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-10.51%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-15.12%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-30.48%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-33.51%

-6.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.91%

-5.21%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.82%

-11.66%

-5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.86%

+0.03%

Volatility

PXH vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 6.78%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHDBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

11.58%

-4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

18.66%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

20.69%

-4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

17.70%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

17.39%

+2.57%

PXH vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than DBEM's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
2.06%1.84%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
4.34%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and DBEM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to PXH (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs DBEM's -33.51%.

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.69% vs 10.53% for PXH. On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.06% for DBEM.

PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.66% for DBEM.

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and DBEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer