PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. SCHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 11.69%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.91% annualized return.


PXF

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
16.56%
6M
20.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
11.69%

SCHC

1D
0.04%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
6.81%
6M
9.38%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
16.56%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
6.81%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and SCHC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010

0.91

The correlation between PXF and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
SCHC

Financial Services

19.7%
12.6%

Industrials

15.1%
22.4%

Technology

11.4%
9.2%

Energy

10.6%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.0%

Basic Materials

10.1%
13.7%

Healthcare

7.2%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
4.1%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.2%

Utilities

3.6%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
8.6%

Financial Services

PXF
19.7%
SCHC
12.6%

Industrials

PXF
15.1%
SCHC
22.4%

Technology

PXF
11.4%
SCHC
9.2%

Energy

PXF
10.6%
SCHC
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
10.2%
SCHC
10.0%

Basic Materials

PXF
10.1%
SCHC
13.7%

Healthcare

PXF
7.2%
SCHC
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

PXF
6.1%
SCHC
4.1%

Communication Services

PXF
4.3%
SCHC
3.2%

Utilities

PXF
3.6%
SCHC
3.2%

Real Estate

PXF
1.8%
SCHC
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXFSCHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.27

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

1.87

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.49

7.03

+6.46

PXF vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXFSCHCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.47

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.33

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.44

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.39

-0.16

Drawdowns

PXF vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and SCHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFSCHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-43.94%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-12.48%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-15.52%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-36.48%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-43.94%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-5.65%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.26%

-10.05%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.31%

-0.45%

Volatility

PXF vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 5.47%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFSCHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

5.47%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

13.49%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

15.86%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

17.56%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

18.02%

+0.05%

PXF vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than SCHC's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.18%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.43%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXF and SCHC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SCHC (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.69% vs 7.91% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 3.18% for PXF.

PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.11% for SCHC.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and SCHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer