PWV vs. XLG
PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWV returned 11.81%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for XLG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
PWV vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PWV has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 11.81%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.
PWV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
XLG
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
PWV vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 12.10% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 29.84% | -14.12% | 16.98% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 7.57% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and XLG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2005 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PWV and XLG has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
XLG
PWV vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 2.31 | +3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.16 | 8.66 | +12.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.15 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.92 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.62 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PWV vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -52.39% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -12.41% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -20.70% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -28.02% | +11.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | -30.46% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.44% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -7.64% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 3.30% | -2.10% |
Volatility
PWV vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 2.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 3.19% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.62% | 9.80% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.31% | 13.33% | -4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 18.68% | -4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 18.84% | -1.68% |
PWV vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and XLG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PWV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.27% vs 11.81% for PWV. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.
PWV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.20% for XLG.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer