PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PWV vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PWV vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWV returned 11.81%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

PWV vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWV having a 11.81% annualized return and RSP not far ahead at 11.86%.

PWV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.43%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.81%

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWV vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF		12.10%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PWV and RSP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005

0.90

The correlation between PWV and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Often compared with PWV:
PWV vs. VTVPWV vs. PBUSPWV vs. PVALPWV vs. CATPWV vs. MGVPWV vs. VTIPWV vs. VOO
Often compared with RSP:
RSP vs. SPYRSP vs. VOORSP vs. VTIRSP vs. FXAIXRSP vs. IVVRSP vs. EUSARSP vs. GSEW

Return for Risk

PWV vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWV vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PWVRSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

1.70

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

2.47

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.30

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

2.49

+3.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.16

9.48

+11.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PWV vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWV and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PWVRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.70

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.52

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.57

-0.15

Drawdowns

PWV vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and RSP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PWVRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.04%

-59.92%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-7.85%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-17.81%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-21.38%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.67%

-39.04%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.38%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-6.65%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

2.06%

-0.86%

Volatility

PWV vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 2.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PWVRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.56%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.62%

8.29%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

11.56%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

16.18%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

18.35%

-1.19%

PWV vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWV vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF		1.81%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

PWV and RSP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to PWV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 11.81% for PWV. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

PWV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.20% for RSP.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWV and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer