PWS vs. EAOA
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA).
PWS and EAOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWS is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer WealthShield Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2017. EAOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. Both PWS and EAOA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PWS vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PWS vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | -0.91% | 8.05% | 14.01% | -3.58% | -12.10% | 14.43% | 26.34% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | -2.04% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than EAOA's -2.04% return.
PWS
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWS vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PWS vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
PWS
EAOA
PWS vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWS | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.22 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.78 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.74 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 7.95 | -5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWS | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.22 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.53 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.78 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between PWS and EAOA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PWS vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EAOA's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 1.47% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 2.21% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.53% | 1.77% | 1.16% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.14% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWS vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, roughly equal to the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and EAOA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWS | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -25.06% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -9.98% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -25.06% | +0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.70% | -5.91% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -5.44% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.18% | +0.13% |
Volatility
PWS vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is 3.85%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that PWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PWS | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 5.33% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 8.40% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.76% | 14.08% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 13.19% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 13.17% | +1.34% |