PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWS vs. DDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PWS vs. DDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PWS vs. DDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PWS
Pacer WealthShield ETF
-0.91%8.05%14.01%-3.58%-12.10%5.05%
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
0.74%12.02%2.93%10.48%-16.19%1.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than DDX's 0.74% return.


PWS

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*

DDX

1D
1.02%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
0.74%
6M
2.79%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWS vs. DDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PWS vs. DDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWS
PWS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DDX
DDX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWS vs. DDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWSDDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

1.54

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

2.17

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.21

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.75

8.58

-5.83

PWS vs. DDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the DDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWS and DDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWSDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.54

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.26

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between PWS and DDX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PWS vs. DDX - Dividend Comparison

PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than DDX's 3.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PWS
Pacer WealthShield ETF
1.47%1.59%1.33%2.21%1.45%0.94%0.53%1.77%1.16%
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
3.53%3.17%3.11%2.41%1.38%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWS vs. DDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, which is greater than DDX's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and DDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PWSDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.93%

-21.27%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-4.41%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-3.21%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-7.36%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.14%

+1.17%

Volatility

PWS vs. DDX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) at 2.75%. This indicates that PWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PWSDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

2.75%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

3.84%

+6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

6.13%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

7.50%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

7.50%

+7.01%