PortfoliosLab logo
PWS vs. FDFIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PWS and FDFIX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PWS vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PWS:

0.54

FDFIX:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

PWS:

0.63

FDFIX:

1.04

Omega Ratio

PWS:

1.08

FDFIX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

PWS:

0.30

FDFIX:

0.69

Martin Ratio

PWS:

0.98

FDFIX:

2.62

Ulcer Index

PWS:

4.72%

FDFIX:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

PWS:

11.53%

FDFIX:

19.78%

Max Drawdown

PWS:

-24.93%

FDFIX:

-33.77%

Current Drawdown

PWS:

-10.36%

FDFIX:

-3.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -2.06% return, which is significantly lower than FDFIX's 1.03% return.


PWS

YTD

-2.06%

1M

-2.81%

6M

-5.56%

1Y

5.70%

3Y*

0.51%

5Y*

6.22%

10Y*

N/A

FDFIX

YTD

1.03%

1M

5.64%

6M

-1.39%

1Y

13.51%

3Y*

14.41%

5Y*

15.95%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pacer WealthShield ETF

Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund

PWS vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PWS vs. FDFIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWS is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWS is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWS is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWS is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWS is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWS is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDFIX is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDFIX is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PWS vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWS and FDFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PWS vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than FDFIX's 1.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
PWS
Pacer WealthShield ETF
1.46%1.34%2.21%1.46%0.94%0.53%1.77%1.16%0.00%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.27%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.27%1.52%1.78%2.16%0.92%

Drawdowns

PWS vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and FDFIX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PWS vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is 3.53%, while Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that PWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...