PUST.PA vs. MGC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC).

PUST.PA and MGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUST.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 20, 2014. MGC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both PUST.PA and MGC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc	-3.99%	5.71%	35.33%	50.06%	-29.76%	38.74%	36.04%	40.41%	4.65%	16.05%
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF	-3.40%	5.15%	35.56%	25.88%	-14.99%	37.12%	11.55%	34.11%	1.08%	7.54%

Different Trading Currencies

PUST.PA is traded in EUR, while MGC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MGC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly lower than MGC's -3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has outperformed MGC with an annualized return of 18.58%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.61% annualized return.

PUST.PA

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: -3.99%
• 6M: -1.37%
• 1Y: 15.67%
• 3Y*: 20.21%
• 5Y*: 13.25%
• 10Y*: 18.58%

MGC

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: -3.40%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUST.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.

PUST.PA

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc

MGC

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF

Return for Risk

PUST.PA vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUST.PA

PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 55
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MGC

MGC Risk / Return Rank: 61
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUST.PA	MGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.52	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	0.86	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.13	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	0.81	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	3.35	+5.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUST.PA and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUST.PA	MGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	0.52	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.75	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	0.78	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.63	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between PUST.PA and MGC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

PUST.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF	1.01%	0.93%	1.15%	1.35%	1.65%	1.17%	1.45%	1.81%	2.10%	1.83%	2.14%	2.11%

Drawdowns

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and MGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUST.PA	MGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-51.93%	+20.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-11.93%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.40%	-25.74%	-5.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.40%	-33.07%	+1.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.71%	-6.33%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	-7.12%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	2.72%	+0.65%

Volatility

PUST.PA vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 4.60%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUST.PA	MGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	4.60%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	10.23%	+1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.64%	21.15%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.82%	17.19%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	18.78%	+1.01%