PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PUST.PA is traded in EUR, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 21.56%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.07% annualized return.


PUST.PA

1D
-0.73%
1M
0.08%
YTD
19.22%
6M
18.71%
1Y
34.89%
3Y*
23.96%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
21.56%

BRK-B

1D
-1.48%
1M
3.21%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.83%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
19.22%5.71%35.33%50.06%-29.76%38.74%36.04%40.41%4.65%16.05%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.30%-2.27%35.48%12.00%9.71%38.60%-6.07%13.44%7.84%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PUST.PA and BRK-B is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2014

0.31

The correlation between PUST.PA and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUST.PA
PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUST.PABRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.05

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

0.26

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

0.59

+9.26

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUST.PA and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -45.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUST.PABRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-45.91%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-11.04%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-20.62%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

-22.31%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-28.74%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-13.57%

+10.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-9.76%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

4.92%

-1.41%

Volatility

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.30%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUST.PABRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

4.30%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

11.32%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

15.23%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.39%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

20.09%

-0.33%

Dividends

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither PUST.PA nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PUST.PA and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUST.PA and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer