PUST.PA vs. BRK-B
PUST.PA (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA returned 21.35%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PUST.PA is traded in EUR, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a 21.89% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 21.35%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.
PUST.PA
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 11.74%
- YTD
- 21.89%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- 25.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.75%
- 10Y*
- 21.35%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- -5.24%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- -7.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 21.89% | 5.71% | 35.33% | 50.06% | -29.76% | 38.74% | 36.04% | 40.41% | 4.65% | 16.05% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -4.29% | -2.27% | 35.48% | 12.00% | 9.71% | 38.60% | -6.07% | 13.44% | 7.84% | 6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUST.PA and BRK-B is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.31 |
The correlation between PUST.PA and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
PUST.PA
BRK-B
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUST.PA | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | -0.49 | +2.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | -0.58 | +3.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.93 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | -0.67 | +4.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | -1.39 | +12.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUST.PA | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | -0.49 | +2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.64 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 0.63 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.49 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -45.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUST.PA | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.40% | -45.91% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -11.04% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.80% | -20.62% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -22.31% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -28.74% | -2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.33% | +18.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -9.72% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 5.55% | -2.10% |
Volatility
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.64%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUST.PA | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.64% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 11.18% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 14.99% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 17.37% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 20.09% | -0.34% |
Dividends
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither PUST.PA nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PUST.PA and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PUST.PA and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer