PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUST.PA vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PUST.PA is traded in EUR, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a 21.89% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 21.35%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.


PUST.PA

1D
0.17%
1M
11.74%
YTD
21.89%
6M
20.26%
1Y
38.71%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
18.75%
10Y*
21.35%

BRK-B

1D
0.00%
1M
1.18%
YTD
-5.24%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
-7.33%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
21.89%5.71%35.33%50.06%-29.76%38.74%36.04%40.41%4.65%16.05%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.29%-2.27%35.48%12.00%9.71%38.60%-6.07%13.44%7.84%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PUST.PA and BRK-B is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.31

The correlation between PUST.PA and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUST.PA
PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUST.PABRK-BDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

-0.49

+2.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

-0.58

+3.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.93

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

-0.67

+4.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.13

-1.39

+12.52

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUST.PA and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUST.PABRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-0.49

+2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.64

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.63

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.49

+0.56

Drawdowns

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -45.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUST.PABRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-45.91%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-11.04%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-20.62%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

-22.31%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-28.74%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.33%

+18.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-9.72%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

5.55%

-2.10%

Volatility

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.64%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUST.PABRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.64%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

11.18%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

14.99%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.81%

17.37%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

20.09%

-0.34%

Dividends

PUST.PA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither PUST.PA nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PUST.PA and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUST.PA and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer