PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PUST.PA vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

PUST.PA vs. SSO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO).

PUST.PA and SSO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUST.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 20, 2014. SSO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. Both PUST.PA and SSO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc		-6.37%5.71%35.33%50.06%-29.76%38.74%36.04%40.41%4.65%16.05%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500		-8.81%11.21%52.95%42.26%-35.20%72.58%11.52%67.14%-10.59%26.61%
Different Trading Currencies

PUST.PA is traded in EUR, while SSO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SSO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a -6.37% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's -8.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 18.28%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.88% annualized return.

PUST.PA

1D
-0.05%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
-6.37%
6M
-3.25%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
18.28%

SSO

1D
4.83%
1M
-8.36%
YTD
-8.81%
6M
-5.71%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
25.55%
5Y*
15.76%
10Y*
20.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc

ProShares Ultra S&P500

Often compared with PUST.PA:
PUST.PA vs. LQQ.PAPUST.PA vs. WPEA.PAPUST.PA vs. XLKQ.LPUST.PA vs. BRK-BPUST.PA vs. ESE.PAPUST.PA vs. ^GSPCPUST.PA vs. MGC
Often compared with SSO:
SSO vs. QLDSSO vs. SPYSSO vs. UPROSSO vs. VOOSSO vs. SPXLSSO vs. SPUUSSO vs. QQQ

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUST.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.

SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

PUST.PA vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PUST.PA
PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PUST.PASSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.48

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

0.91

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.83

+1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.88

3.27

+2.62

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUST.PA and SSO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PUST.PASSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.48

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.49

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.59

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.37

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between PUST.PA and SSO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

PUST.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500		0.82%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Drawdowns

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -83.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and SSO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

PUST.PASSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-84.67%

+53.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-23.17%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

-46.73%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-59.34%

+27.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.00%

-13.46%

+3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-19.72%

+13.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

5.38%

-2.04%

Volatility

PUST.PA vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) is 4.13%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 9.41%. This indicates that PUST.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

PUST.PASSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

9.41%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

18.87%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

38.08%

-17.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

32.64%

-12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

35.67%

-15.89%