PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA).
PUST.PA and WPEA.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUST.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 20, 2014. WPEA.PA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World NET TR EUR Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2024. Both PUST.PA and WPEA.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | -3.99% | 5.71% | 22.25% |
WPEA.PA iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF | -1.17% | 6.89% | 14.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly lower than WPEA.PA's -1.17% return.
PUST.PA
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -3.99%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 18.58%
WPEA.PA
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PUST.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WPEA.PA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA — Risk / Return Rank
PUST.PA
WPEA.PA
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUST.PA | WPEA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.74 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.60 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 13.91 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUST.PA | WPEA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.74 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.66 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between PUST.PA and WPEA.PA is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither PUST.PA nor WPEA.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than WPEA.PA's maximum drawdown of -21.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and WPEA.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUST.PA | WPEA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.40% | -21.59% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -13.18% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -4.07% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -3.23% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 1.69% | +1.68% |
Volatility
PUST.PA vs. WPEA.PA - Volatility Comparison
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) at 4.31%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPEA.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PUST.PA | WPEA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.31% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 8.26% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 15.89% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 14.87% | +4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 14.87% | +4.92% |